Apex Code Coverage Hack

Declaimer: please be aware that all things into this article are “bad practice” and should not be used constantly, it might be used for a really urgent production deployment when you have faced with a broken tests and as a result a code coverage has dropped down than 75% and you has been blocked.

As you know salesforce requires at least 75% test coverage for production deployment. You can find the following statement in documentation:

The code coverage percentage for a class or trigger displayed on the Apex Classes or the Apex Triggers page includes a fraction between parentheses with the numbers used to compute this percentage, for example, 90% (72/80). The code coverage percentage is calculated by dividing the number of lines covered by tests by the total number of lines that are part of the coverage calculation. Some lines of code are excluded from code coverage calculation, such as:

• Comments
• System.debug statements
• Test methods

A code statement that is broken up into multiple lines—only the first line is counted
To generate code coverage results, you must run your Apex tests first. If no tests have been run, no code coverage data will exist and 0% (No coverage data) displays for classes (except for test classes) and triggers on the Apex Classes and Apex Triggers pages.

Cool! The code coverage calculation is pretty simple and we can cheat the system. Just use the following code


/*
Please improve your tests and remove this class as soon as possible
*/
public class CodeCoverageHack {
    public static void hack() {
        Integer i = 0;
        i++;
        i++;
        i++;
        i++;
        i++;
        i++;
        // you can continue this method with i++; up to 3000 lines
        // after that you would be stoped by limit of size
        // but you can create a few such methods
 }

    public static void hack1() {
         // do the same thing ...
    }

    @isTest static void runTest() {
        CodeCoverageHack.hack();
        CodeCoverageHack.hack1();
        //...
        CodeCoverageHack.hackN();
    }
}
That’s all.   ✌

How to run future method in test class

We have to use future method inside the  startTest/stopTest:

Test.startTest();
myClass.futuremethod( someID );
Test.stopTest();

Test.stopTest() does not return until your future method has completed.

Customize error message for trigger and display error message below the field

This Post demonstrates how to display error message in particular field level.

SObject SomeRecord;

SomeRecord.SomeField__c.addError('Custom Message');

//or

SomeRecord.someField__c.addError(someException);

Note:

We cannot add it to a field dynamically. This error mapping can only be done with a hard-coded field.

Useful Links:
https://salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/79291/how-to-use-adderror-with-a-dynamically-derived-field-name

List has no rows for assignment to SObject  error

 Consider following query:

   
      id p;

      user u = [SELECT Id from user where Name = :username];

      if (u != null)

      p = u.Id;

•  The above code will fail if there is no user record with the matching username. It doesn't actually return a null.

 It would be safer to do the following:

    id p;

     user[] userlist = [SELECT Id from user where Name = :username];

     if (userlist.size() > 0)

       p = userlist[0].Id;

Trigger for Adding and removing User to Permission set based on User roles

trigger AssignPermissionSet on User (after insert,after Update) {
    PermissionSet pereset = [SELECT Id FROM PermissionSet WHERE Label ='SBU Impact Visible'];
    Set<ID> addIds = new Set<Id>(),
            removeIds = new Set<Id>(),
            roleIds = new Map<Id, UserRole>([
        SELECT  Id FROM UserRole
        WHERE   Name LIKE '%E&C%' OR Name LIKE '%Commerical Ops%' OR Name LIKE '%Energy & Chemicals%' OR Name LIKE '%All Fluor%'
    ]).keySet();
    for(User record: Trigger.new) {
        (record.IsActive && roleIds.contains(record.UserRoleId)? addIds: removeIds).add(record.Id);
    }
   
    PermissionSetAssignment[] permissionSetList = new PermissionSetAssignment[0];
    addIds.removeAll(new Map<Id, AggregateResult>([SELECT AssigneeId Id FROM PermissionSetAssignment
       WHERE AssigneeId = :addIds AND PermissionSetId = :pereset.Id GROUP BY AssigneeId]).keySet());
   
    for(Id userId: addIds) {
        permissionSetList.add(new PermissionSetAssignment(PermissionSetId = pereset.id, AssigneeId = userId));
    }
    upsert permissionSetList;
    delete [SELECT Id FROM PermissionSetAssignment WHERE AssigneeId = :removeIds AND PermissionSetId = :pereset.Id];
}

                            PermissionSetAssignment:

• Use the PermissionSetAssignment object to query permission set assignments to find out which permission sets are assigned to which users.
• Each user may be assigned to many permission sets and each permission set may be assigned to many users.
• Each PermissionSetAssignment ID represents the association of a single user and single permission set.

For example, to search for all of the permission sets assigned to a particular user:

SELECT Id, PermissionSetId
FROM PermissionSetAssignment
WHERE AssigneeId = '005600000017cKt'

To search for all users assigned to a particular permission set:

SELECT Id, AssigneeId
FROM PermissionSetAssignment
WHERE PermissionSetId = '0PS30000000000e'

Note:

You can also create a new permission set assignment, or use delete to remove a permission set that's assigned to a user. To update an assignment, delete an existing assignment and insert a new one.

Possible Errors:

Solution:

When assigning a permission set, if the PermissionSet ​ has a UserLicenseId, its UserLicenseId and the Profile ​UserLicenseId must match.


If Permission set is already present for user.Following Error will occur.